By 2021, the introduction of “technologies and ethics” was introduced by pressing to direct human-made artificial intelligence (AI), especially when deployed by law enforcement agencies. The use of biometric IDs improves as a face recognition. Innovation empowers organizations to monitor the behavior of their employees. As they grow, new developments create two different ways in which behavioral violations can be committed, and ways to address or prevent such offenses.
In the European Union (EU), for example, officials distributed a draft version of the Artificial Intelligence Act. However experts warn that although it is a good development. It will do nothing to stop the fundamental opposition to the AI.
The work of the organizations in examining innovative organizations has also been very focused throughout 2021, since a Supreme Court decision in February that ruled Uber’s popular ride application should include its drivers as employees instead of self-employed.
Here are the top 10 Computer Weekly accounts and 2021 character:
1. A claim for mining approval against key technical organizations is not allowed
In November 2021, a U.S. district court judge pardoned a legal case against five key U.S. companies accused of deliberately seizing cobalt seized children ‘s cut or mutilated profits for denying fundamental freedoms in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Which Computer Weekly provided the account in late 2019.
The lawsuit filed by Alphabet, Apple, Dell, Microsoft, and Tesla has filed a lawsuit of this kind against innovative organizations, many of which rely on their cobalt chains to control items such as electric cars, cell phones and PCs.
As shown in the judgment – which the victims intended to pursue – there was not enough reason to link between the leadership of the organizations and the wounds of the perpetrators. but lawyers speaking to the families said “organizations have told the court they are just buyers of cobalt and have nothing to do with DRC mines. while informing customers that they have control over their stock chains and endorsing ‘strategies’ that prevent young people from working in the cobalt mines from which they come.
“Even if the parties misled the court. Their clients are a real issue that should be decided by the judge, not the court by the process process. We hope the appellate court will agree with us on that. ”
2. Dialogue: Uber driver Yaseen Aslam in his Supreme Court fight and what’s next for the gig staff
In February, a similar decision by the UK Supreme Court found that Uber should be visible. Its drivers as workers, who deserve better working conditions and interesting guarantees.
Prior to the decision, Uber listed its drivers as independent, independent, independent professionals on the basis that its application links potential customers to clients – a position the organization has been adhering to for all four years of adjudication and application cases. the way to the Supreme Court.
Following the decision, Yaseen Aslam, the leader of App Drivers. Couriers Union (ADCU) and one of the two separate inquiries into the Uber case, spoke to Computer Weekly about how the case started and its recommendations.
As a result of this decision, the GMB-distributed gauges suggest that “many thousands” of Uber drivers may be in line to receive £ 12,000 each. Legal office Keller Lenkner, speaking to about 10,000 drivers at the Uber prosecution meeting, also ruled that every driver could guarantee he would return somewhere for £ 10,000 and £ 12,000.
3. Victims of ‘spy police’ share information on ongoing information insurance
Established in 2015 to monitor the actions of the secret police – including the Special Demonstration Squad, formed in 1968 to attack British opposition groups as part of the Met Special Police Force – The Secret Police Initiative began its second phase on 21 April. 2021.
Officials have reportedly collected and disseminated a large volume of individual data about left-wing activists, including women who have targeted them for comfortable sexual contact, recognizing “clearly unfair and inappropriate”.
Witnesses also expressed concern about the retention of their data without their knowledge. The extent to which it has affected and continues to have an impact on their lives.
4. A serious and serious obligation to the PCSC Bill could undermine the rights of information in the UK
Freedom fighters are issuing a warning about the imposition of measures to reduce violence in the UK government’s impending police, crime, sentencing and courts (PCSC) bill.
The actions will give the police a new opportunity to meet and share information about people who are said to be involved in “real cruelty. Yet fundamental freedom fighters and civil society organizations ensure that this can undermine existing freedom of the “same name of technology” and further the focus on discriminatory police studies.
There is more concern, especially among people from the clinic phone. Refrain from accessing important public administration for fear that the data will be used unnecessarily against them.
To get acquainted with Parliament on March 9, 2021, the 308-page PCSC Bill was recently revised. It has caused major wars in urban areas throughout the UK due to various conflicting measures. For example, it makes the Gypsies, the Roma, and the way of life of a group of pilgrims a crime and greatly reduces people’s ability to resist.
5. The proposed European AI guide misses the mark in gaining independence
In its proposal for the Performance Intelligence Act (AIA), promulgated on 21 April 2021. The European Commission (EC) adopted a robust risk-based approach to managing new inventions. It strengthens the hand in the construction